Establishing an economic equilibrium between Government and the ‘Key Financial Beneficiary’ of the wealth of the country
A legal process demanding Socio-Economic Justice based on Truth and Reconciliation as commenced in 1994.
A pro-active defence is a legal right and a matter of fundamental public importance to Namibia and the Western World.
Charles S Courtney-Clarke
Website under construction
In the early 1960s, the late John F. Kennedy described the modi operandi of a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that has captured the Western World, manipulated it, the United Nation (UN), the UN Security Council, the EU, the UK, and the United States from exercising their independent legal obligation to dispense social and economic justice in Namibia, prior to its political transition to independence in 1989, during that period and thereafter, as my defence as witness and a victim demonstrates.
SOCIAL JUSTICE CASES – Crimes of 1989 committed in Namibia – (under construction.)
From respective authorities, this socio-economic justice forum demands an investigation into and the prosecution of those who perpetrated crimes of genocide against humanity and the international community in 1989 in Namibia. Crimes against humanity are termed Social Justice Cases, but simultaneously, this forum demands an investigation into and the prosecution of perpetrators of significant economic crimes (Economic Justice Cases), the latter amounting to billions of dollars in damages the country/government has suffered as has been catalogued between 1971 to and 2006. This forum seeks to deliver social and economic justice in Namibia in what, by design, currently is a politically fragmenting society confronting the Challenge of State Capture. As a witness and victim of the forces that committed these crimes I state that the Declaration and Demand 25th January 2014 to the United Nations and International Criminal Court, file number OTP-CR-772/09 to investigate the crimes of 1989, submitted at Windhoek in January 2014, resulted in the removal of UN Resident Coordinator MUSINGA T. BANDORA and the UN Executive Associate, INGRID K. MGOHAGULEMA, to whom the Declaration and Demand was delivered. The officials replacing them found all the information on the computers at the Windhoek office removed when they arrived, and therefore no evidence of the Declaration and Demand to investigate the crimes of 1989 committed during the Namibian transition to independence as supervised by the UN was to be found. The Declaration and Demand 2014 to investigate the unsolved crimes committed against humanity and the United Nations in Namibia during its transition to independence from 1989 to 1990 contains the crimes as listed below. 1) The bombing of the UN office in Outjo, Namibia. 2) The capture and escape of the perpetrators of the bombing. 3) The assassination of Advocate Anton Lubowski. 4) The secret murder of hundreds of SWAPO captives in 1988/9 In the first instance, the appeal in the Declaration and Demand to the UN petitioned it to determine the existence and integrity of the police dockets of these crimes. These police dockets are in the custody of the local Namibian police responsible for investigating the crimes and whom the United Nations have relied on as a first legal remedy in the prescribed procedures to resolve the crimes committed against itself and humanity. In the evolution of my defense since 1994 formal complaints to investigate these crimes were submitted to the authorities as listed below. A catalogue of cogent evidence presented in defense of a self-determination, pro-active national economic objective since 1978, is presented and reliant on a cardinal principle in modern international law (commonly regarded as a jus cogens rule), binding, as such, on the United Nations as authoritative interpretation of the Charter’s norms.[1][2] It states that people, based on respect for the principle of equal rights and fair equality of opportunity, have the right to freely choose their sovereignty and international political status with no interference. In the evolution of my defense since 1994 formal complaints to investigate these crimes were submitted to the authorities as listed below. The Namibian Government and Police 1994. Anti-Corruption Commission Namibia, complaint file C.S. Courtney-Clarke, ACC HQO 13-000610. South Africa – Directorate of Special Operations (DSO)/Scorpions) and Priority Crimes Litigation Unit 2002 – 2009. British High Commission. Windhoek, Namibia, 2002. Truth and Reconciliation Commission, South Africa, 2007, complainant Gaby Lubowski. International Criminal Court, file number OTP-CR-772/09. United Nations, Windhoek, Declaration and Demand, 2014. In all respects they have defeated the ends of justice in one form or another as described in the first and only investigation into the murder of Anton Lubowski by Justice A.J. Mohamed in 1990: “[…] the murder of Advocate Lubowski is a matter of very fundamental public importance. His cold-blooded murder is a very serious matter. The vigorous prosecution of whoever might have been responsible for this deed is clearly crucial to the administration and the image of justice in Namibia. That image and that interest might prejudicially be impaired if there ever follows a perception in the public (legitimate or otherwise), that justice was defeated by procedural complexities, by legal stratagems, by tactical manoeuvres or by any improper collusion” In 1991, a year after independence, The Privatisation Concept was presented to the new SWAPO government, by the international community under cover of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) as the Inter-regional Network on Privatization, 1991 (INP) – seen in the picture in blue cover (Guidelines on Privatization – The INP is a Division of the Global and Inter-regional Program. The scheme incorporated the introduction of a dysfunctional National Development Plan of Small and Medium Enterprises (NDP-SME) supposedly to enrich the country. The question is raised why the United Nations would facilitate the Inter-regional Network on Privatization (INP/NDP-SME) scheme when it did not support it, as it stated in the Preface on a single page of the Guidelines Page 3 – that the views expressed by INP were not necessarily the views of the UNDP – extract inserted below. The “White Paper” quoted above is a formal response to the South African Interim Government’s privatisation of government assets and services, presented by The Late Advocate Anton Lubowski in 1988 and was investigated by Courtney-Clarke and written up by legal Drafter Diane Hubbart Corbit. The yellow document written in Afrikaans is a document compiled by the Interim Government dealing with the privatisation of the National Transport Corporation 1986 Namibia. The Oppenheimer Family’s control of multiple corporate conglomerate companies and financial institutions is best described by Corporate Investigators Kroll and Associates in London given in the video clip. ….. “Anton Lubowski was assassinated at his front gate of his home. Questions about whether or not he was a paid agent-spy for the South African Apartheid military intelligence was proliferated by the media soon after his death, leading to more questions than answers – The entire media perception of his assassination was spun into confusion – “Smoke and Mirrors” scenario”- from the outset by premeditate design to detract from his discovery in my company of the “trigger motive” for his assassination – namely, 100s of SWAPO Captives being secretly murdered by South African Apartheid military, is conclusive. The South Africa Apartheid Government’s fraudulent Military and illegal Funding facet in the planning of Adv’ Anton Lubowski’s assassination, devised / fabricated to appear as though he was an Apartheid Military Agent / spy, was discovered conclusively by the Truth & Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Video Clip (TRC- Episode 47, Part 02) in the cross-examination of Magnus Malan’s fabrication of his allegation that Lubowski was an Apartheid paid Agent. The Clip is a final addition, down the line, of my personal knowledge, and how the bank account numbers were obtained, in this facet in the Plot to assassinate him, that corroborates the facts presented as a victim and witness in Declaration & Demands to the ICC/UN 2009, 2014, 2019 to exercise it’s legal obligation to investigate these crimes; the bombing of the UN office, in Outjo, and escape of the culprits. As a result of the failure of the respective authorities to act and dispense justice in Namibia, this website will serve to communicate the ongoing legal demands to International Criminal Court, Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, EU – Delegation of the European Union, South Africa, the United Nations. __________________________________________ ECONOMIC JUSTICE CASES – 1981 to 2007 ( under construction) The case of the Disappearing Diamonds,1980-1994. The case of the Disappearing Diamonds, 1980-1994. The evidence presented commences with Chief Justice P. W Thirion’s findings in the final report of the commission of Inquiry dated 1985. The object of the Commission was to inquire “into alleged irregularities and misapplication of property in representative authorities and the central authority of South West Africa/Namibia”. BBC- Granada “World in Action” covered the Thirion Commission’s findings in a documentary film produced in 1987, titled “The Case of The Disappearing Diamonds” and the BBC 120 minute feature film, version TX, 17 and 24, 1994. “The Diamond Empire” is presented as supporting evidence. The reference to press reports on these crimes prior to their outcome is significant in that such publicly declared information provides grounds on which the outcome of a court case can be predicted. In essence the greater the variance from the predictable outcome of a court case, the higher the level of corruption in the judiciary, an index referred to as “Predictability index” is sighted in World Bank 1997,World Development Report, 1997, Page 8, a measure among other to determine corruption in the judiciary. The Thirion Commission’s findings and the films produced at that time present evidence of the clandestine manner in which the Oppenheimer Family had manipulated the Namibian government the year after it was established by the SAAG in 1980. The Oppenheimers ensured that the new interim government could not verify the massive quantity of diamonds it was mining and transporting by helicopter to Kimberly in South Africa. In this way – and contrary to international law – a catalogue of cogent evidence shows the manner in which the Oppenheimers amassed an illegal fortune at Namibia’s expense. The Diamond Industry Protection Proclamation 17 of 1939 (DIPP), regulated the “Diamond Board” established in terms of the Diamond Board Establishment Proclamation, 1921. Examination of the Diamond Board’s responsibilities as the guardian of the States diamond resource, and how this responsibility was subverted by the Oppenheimers, is given in the Thirion Commission report on page 167-188. In 1981, immediately after the Government Services Act 1980 (Namibia) was enacted, Oppenheimer (De Beers, Consolidated Diamond Mine – CDM, and Dicorp in Kimberley, concluded an illegal agreement, referred to as the DPA (Diamond Producers Association agreement), with the newly formed SWA Interim Government 1980 and the South African Apartheid Government (SAAG). This DPA agreement secretly manipulated absolute physical control of Namibia’s diamond production, with no independent verification by the State of the actual diamond production mined at Oranjemund which were then exported directly to Kimberley. In 1982, public accusations made by Eric Lang concerning the ineffective State controls over Oppenheimer, De Beers, Anglo American (ODA)’s Consolidated Diamond Mine CDM) billion dollar Namibian diamond production, and the evidence supplied by the Late Gordon D Brown gave rise to the establishment of Justice Thirion Commission of Inquiry – into alleged irregularities and misapplication of property in representative authorities and the central authority of South West Africa / Namibia, Eighth Interim Report 1985 Control by the State over the prospecting and mining for, and disposing of minerals in South West Africa / Namibia, illegally eliminated the government’s control over its diamond production. The “capture” of the Diamond Board was described in the Thirion Report 1985 on page 185 “the Diamond Board’s agents who are themselves CDM employees merely take possession of such diamonds as are handed to them by CDM and weighed and dispatched the parcels to Kimberley. Unless the Boards control extends all the way from the production site to the sorting table and from there to the final sale and is exercised by persons independent of the producer, the purported control remains a sham.” The documentary film “The Case of The Disappearing Diamonds” inspired the making of a comprehensive feature film on the Oppenheimer’s in 1994, titled “The Diamond Empire”, in which the Oppenheimer Family refused to participate. As the “Key Financial Beneficiary” of the wealth of Namibia, the Oppenheimers’ control over Namibia’s primary resources and financial institutions came about as a result of their pursuit of the premeditated plan to “colonize” Namibia’s economy. They could only succeed in this through a government they had manipulated, i.e. “captured”, on two fronts. This capture commenced in 1971 and was consolidated in 1990. This is the focal point of how to understand the magnitude of the Oppenheimer’s’ wealth and the cause of our country’s increasing national financial despair and social discontent. The persistent theft of Namibia’s mineral and marine resources is a result of the Oppenheimer’s deeply entrenched network of control over strategic government tasks, particularly in the fields of the judiciary, in state prosecution, and in the police force. It was/is meticulously choreographed to control the Namibian State’s affairs and thus escape justice. In 1987, the late UN Commissioner to Namibia, Bernt Carlsson, expressed his view on De Beers, Anglo American and their illegal exploitation of Namibia’s diamond and mineral resources. It clearly supported the findings of Justice Thirion’s Report of 1985. The record on which this statement was made is luckily intact. The head quarters of the loot robbed from central southern Africa. ANGOLA. US$14m/per week of illegal diamonds purchased by De Beers that was fueling the war in the country in 1992. Maurice Tempelsman, New York, Lazara Kaplan.
Seven cases during 1992 and 1993, some of them before court, are presented to show the collusion between the Oppenheimers’ and the SAAG’s STRATCOM officials defeating the ends of justice in Namibia, with the Oppenheimers fuelling the war in Angola at US$ 14m/week.
Please see Application to the United Nations:”
In October 2014, Charles Courtney-Clarke created a public private forum “establishing an economic equilibrium between the key financial beneficiaries to the wealth of the country and the government”. The website recorded that an application was submitted to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and to the International Criminal Court (ICC) to compel the investigation into the unsolved crimes against humanity committed by the South African Apartheid Government during the Namibian independence process supervised by the United Nations Transition Assistance Group (UNTAG), between April 1989 to March 1990, in terms of UN Security Council Resolution 435 (1978)……
…..As a result of the failure of the respective authorities to act and dispense justice in Namibia, South Africa and Her Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom, this website will serve to communicate the on-going demands to International Institutions and governments to dispense Social and Economic Justice.
Excellent work!
The quest for social and economic justice should start right at the beginning with the African bantu Expansion in 1300 AD. The aboriginal khoe-San of Namibia (Basters, Coloureds, naman and San) have been wronged by many nations of the world, conglomerates, gangs, rich families and influential individuals. The trend is unchanged today. All perpetrators must be held accountable: Africans, Europeans, Asians, Middle Eastern countries, Latin Americans and Namibians. The aboriginal khoe-san of Namibia eat soil while thieves and liars live like kings. Where is the justice in that? Swapo must return our ancestral land and property. They must answer for their crimes against the aboriginal peoples of Namibia, Namibians and humanity.
Family needs assistant on the death of their father April 1984 at filling station together with three Americans citizen
Hi,
We’re wondering if you’ve considered taking the written content from economic-justice.tv and converting it into videos to promote on Youtube? It’s another method of generating traffic.
There’s a 14 day free trial available to you at the following link: https://bit.ly/2CbkcMo
Regards,
Malorie