Establishing an economic equilibrium between Government and the ‘Key Financial Beneficiary’ of the wealth of the country
A legal process demanding Socio-Economic Justice based on Truth and Reconciliation as commenced in 1994.
A pro-active defence is a legal right and a matter of fundamental public importance to Namibia and the Western World.
Charles S Courtney-Clarke
Website under construction
In the early 1960s, the late John F. Kennedy described the modi operandi of a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that has captured the Western World, manipulated it, the United Nation (UN), the UN Security Council, the EU, the UK, the United States and the International Criminal Court (ICC) from exercising their independent legal obligation to dispense social and economic justice in Namibia, prior to its political transition to independence in 1989, during that period and thereafter, as my defence as witness and a victim demonstrates.
SOCIAL JUSTICE CASES – Crimes of 1989 committed in Namibia – (under construction.)
From respective authorities, this socio-economic justice forum demands an investigation into and the prosecution of those who perpetrated crimes of genocide against humanity and the international community in 1989 in Namibia. Crimes against humanity are termed Social Justice Cases, but simultaneously, this forum demands an investigation into and the prosecution of perpetrators of significant economic crimes (Economic Justice Cases), the latter amounting to billions of dollars in damages the country/government has suffered as has been catalogued between 1971 to and 2006. This forum seeks to deliver social and economic justice in Namibia in what, by design, currently is a politically fragmenting society confronting the Challenge of State Capture.
As a witness and victim of the forces that committed these crimes I state that the Declaration and Demand 25th January 2014 to the United Nations and International Criminal Court, file number OTP-CR-772/09 to investigate the crimes of 1989, submitted at Windhoek in January 2014, resulted in the removal of UN Resident Coordinator MUSINGA T. BANDORA and the UN Executive Associate, INGRID K. MGOHAGULEMA, to whom the Declaration and Demand was delivered. The officials replacing them found all the information on the computers at the Windhoek office removed when they arrived, and therefore no evidence of the Declaration and Demand to investigate the crimes of 1989 committed during the Namibian transition to independence as supervised by the UN was to be found.
The Declaration and Demand 2014 to investigate the unsolved crimes committed against humanity and the United Nations in Namibia during its transition to independence from 1989 to 1990 contains the crimes as listed below.
1) The bombing of the UN office in Outjo, Namibia.
2) The capture and escape of the perpetrators of the bombing.
3) The murder of Advocate Anton Lubowski.
4) The secret murder of hundreds of SWAPO captives in 1988/9
In the first instance, the appeal in the Declaration and Demand to the UN petitioned it to determine the existence and integrity of the police dockets of these crimes. These police dockets are in the custody of the local Namibian police responsible for investigating the crimes and whom the United Nations have relied on as a first legal remedy in the prescribed procedures to resolve the crimes committed against itself and humanity.
In the evolution of my defense since 1994 formal complaints to investigate these crimes were submitted to the authorities as listed below. A catalogue of cogent evidence presented in defense of a self-determination, pro-active national economic objective since 1978, is presented and reliant on a cardinal principle in modern international law (commonly regarded as a jus cogens rule), binding, as such, on the United Nations as authoritative interpretation of the Charter’s norms.[1][2] It states that people, based on respect for the principle of equal rights and fair equality of opportunity, have the right to freely choose their sovereignty and international political status with no interference.
In the evolution of my defense since 1994 formal complaints to investigate these crimes were submitted to the authorities as listed below.
The Namibian Government and Police 1994.
Anti-Corruption Commission Namibia, complaint file C.S. Courtney-Clarke, ACC HQO 13-000610.
South Africa – Directorate of Special Operations (DSO)/Scorpions) and Priority Crimes Litigation Unit 2002 – 2009.
British High Commission. Windhoek, Namibia, 2002.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission, South Africa, 2007, complainant Gaby Lubowski.
International Criminal Court, file number OTP-CR-772/09.
United Nations, Windhoek, Declaration and Demand, 2014.
In all respects they have defeated the ends of justice in one form or another as described in the first and only investigation into the murder of Anton Lubowski by Justice A.J. Mohamed in 1990: “[…] the murder of Advocate Lubowski is a matter of very fundamental public importance. His cold-blooded murder is a very serious matter. The vigorous prosecution of whoever might have been responsible for this deed is clearly crucial to the administration and the image of justice in Namibia.That image and that interest might prejudicially be impaired if there ever follows a perception in the public (legitimate or otherwise), that justice was defeated by procedural complexities, by legal stratagems, by tactical manoeuvres or by any improper collusion” .
These crimes committed in Namibia by the White South African Apartheid Government (SAAG) were perpetrated within a greater premeditated economic colonization plan, designed and directed by the “Key Financial Beneficiary”(KFB) to the wealth of Namibia to perpetuate its existing capture of the state, ownership and control of the wealth of the country. The “Key Financial Beneficiary” of the wealth of Namibia is the Oppenheimer Family (E. Oppenheimer & Sons). Funded by the J P Morgan bankers during the gold rush in South Africa in 1888, the Oppenheimers have evolved to be decisive owners and controllers of the initially Rothschild-funded corporations De Beers, Anglo American, and Barclays Bank – on the back of Namibian diamonds.
This premeditated economic plan was primarily devised to counter the nationalization of industrial assets and mineral rights by governments that commenced in 1950 when Iran nationalized its oil industry. The economic colonization plan commenced with the announcement of the argument that in all respects, private industry can provide better services than governments.
Following these widely published economic scenario planning pronouncements in the mid-1970s, the concept of privatization mechanisms (i.e. privatization, commercialization, marketization and globalization of the package), were devised and strategically linked to a dysfunctional National Development Plan (NDP) promoting Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) activities which plan was imposed upon governments to in-debt it. The Plan emerged in harmony across borders from the United Kingdom to South Africa and Namibia. The scheme is well catalogued from a Namibian perspective.
In 1991, a year after independence, The Privatisation Concept was presented to the new SWAPO government, by the international community under cover of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) as the Inter-regional Network on Privatization, 1991 (INP) – seen in the picture in blue cover (Guidelines on Privatization – The INP is a Division of the Global and Inter-regional Program. The scheme incorporated the introduction of a National Development Plan of Small and Medium Enterprises (NDP-SME) supposedly to enrich the country.
This long-term premeditated economic colonisation scheme (INP /NDP-SME) is twofold as the evidence presented shows; a plan devised to indebt the government by imposing an illusionary NDP/SME scheme to enrich the country and sequentially obtain the countries industrial assets and natural resources through privatisation mechanisms devised for that purpose, as presented in the Preliminary Report on Privatisation 1986-88.
The concept was formulated in 1971/72 and devised in retaliation to governments’ nationalization of private international natural resources assets that commenced in 1950 in Iran.
In 1991, a year after independence the Inter-regional Network on Privatisation (INP/NDP-SME) guidelines were introduced through United Nations Development Program (UNDP) to merge “hand in glove” with the South African Apartheid Government’s establishment of a government in Namibia in 1980, which it meticulously structured – transferring key industrial assets into separate legal entities during the 1980s – in collusion with the Key Financial Beneficiary (KFB) to the wealth of Namibia to accommodate the NDP-SME scheme, contrary to international law. The “Key Financial Beneficiary” of the wealth of Namibia is the Oppenheimer Family (E. Oppenheimer & Sons) evolved to be decisive owners and controllers of De Beers, Anglo American, and Barclays Bank – on the back of Namibian diamonds.
The question is raised why the United Nations would facilitate the Inter-regional Network on Privatization (INP/NDP-SME) scheme when it did not support it, as it stated in the Preface on a single page of the Guidelines Page 3 – that the views expressed by INP were not necessarily the views of the UNDP – extract inserted below.
The “White Paper” quoted above is a formal response to the South African Interim Government’s privatisation of government assets and services, presented by The Late Advocate Anton Lubowski in 1988 and was investigated by Courtney-Clarke and written up by Diane Hubbart Corbit. The yellow document written in Afrikaans is a document compiled by the Interim Government dealing with the privatisation of the National Transport Corporation 1986 Namibia.
The scheme is engineered for the sole purpose of perpetuating the KFB’s economic colonization of the country’s wealth. The long-term goal of creating a Corporate Feudal System (CFS – i.e. a New World Order) which aspires to bankrupt governments, is a tactic to inhibit any attempt by government to nationalize KFB’s private multi-national corporate assets in the future, and in the process acquire the States strategic industrial assets and services, as they flounder financially, through privatisation mechanisms devise for that purpose, regardless of the social consequences of their actions.
The “Key Financial Beneficiary” of the wealth of Namibia is the Oppenheimer Family (E. Oppenheimer & Sons). Funded by the J P Morgan bankers during the gold rush in South Africa in 1888, the Oppenheimers have evolved to be decisive owners and controllers of the initially Rothschild-funded corporations De Beers, Anglo American, and Barclays Bank – on the back of Namibian diamonds.
The Oppenheimer Family in turn control/own hundreds of subsidiary corporate conglomerate companies and financial institutions through interlocking shareholdings. The precise manner in which it asserts its control is best described by Corporate Investigators Kroll and Associates in London.
HARRY OPPENHEIMER, 80 years of age, who dominated the South African economy for nearly half of the past century.
HARRY OPPENHEIMER’S EMPIRE
https://www.nytimes.com/1989/03/19/magazine/harry-oppenheimer-s-empire-going-for-the-gold.html.
The South African Apartheid Government (SAAG)
South Africa’s mandate to administer Namibia in 1966 was terminated by an International Court of Justice ruling of 1971. It declared the South African Apartheid Government’s occupation of Namibia illegal. It also declared the exploitation of Namibia’s natural resources by foreign multi-national corporations to be illegal. ( https://undocs.org/pdf?symbol=en/A/RES/32/15 ) This led to a predictable decline in “White” political control in Namibia and South Africa, and fear of a future “unpredictable” Black government reared its head.
Upon these rulings, the Nationalist Party did an about-turn on its threat to nationalize KFB’s mining assets in the mid-1960s. The escalation of nationalization of multi-national corporations’ industrial assets and natural resource exploitation rights by governments’, at that time posed the biggest threat to the KFB and its associates in the Western World.
The SAAG then established an interim government in Namibia in 1980, contrary to international law, and simultaneously it set up a secret parallel government management structure (namely STRATCOM, a “third force”) through which it effected and managed the greater economic colonization/privatisation of Namibian assets.
The new, interim Namibian government was structured during the 1980s to accommodate easy access to manipulate government companies that owned its strategic industrial assets. The sole purpose of arranging these assets into independent legal entities facilitated easy access to them by KFB after the country achieves independence from apartheid rule.
Namibia obtained independence in 1989/90, supervised by the UN in terms of UN Security Council Resolution 435, 1978. SAAG’s “Hit Squads” such as the CCB/BSB were on a rampage of genocide and executed people who opposed the corporate feudal economic colonization scheme. These are among the crimes mentioned that I demand to be investigated in the public interest.
STRATCOM’s Military Chief Magnus Malan, in the company of Attorney Penzhorn, under cross examination on the murder Late Anton Lubowski, which he masterminded with security police/BOSS to cover up Lubowski’s discovery of a secret genocide of 100s of Namibian citizens in 1988-89, was conducted by the South African military “hit squads”. The fabricated payment and case made by SA Military alluding to Lubowski as an SA agent was exposed under cross examination at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in SA is viewed in the video clip below. This is merely one item of a catalogue of cogent evidence of how justice was and is being defeated by ‘tactical manoeuvres and improper collusion’.
As a result of the failure of the respective authorities to act and dispense justice in Namibia, this website will serve to communicate the ongoing legal demands to International Criminal Court, Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, EU – Delegation of the European Union, South Africa, the United Nations, a private judicial forum to implicated manipulated international institutions and governments to ensure that social and economic justice are dispensed.
__________________________________________
ECONOMIC JUSTICE CASES – 1981 to 2007 ( under construction)
The case of the Disappearing Diamonds,1980-1994.
The case of the Disappearing Diamonds, 1980-1994.
The evidence presented commences with Chief Justice P. W Thirion’s findings in the final report of the commission of Inquiry dated 1985. The object of the Commission was to inquire “into alleged irregularities and misapplication of property in representative authorities and the central authority of South West Africa/Namibia”.
BBC- Granada “World in Action” covered the Thirion Commission’s findings in a documentary film produced in 1987, titled “The Case of The Disappearing Diamonds” and the BBC 120 minute feature film, version TX, 17 and 24, 1994. “The Diamond Empire” is presented as supporting evidence.
The reference to press reports on these crimes prior to their outcome is significant in that such publicly declared information provides grounds on which the outcome of a court case can be predicted. In essence the greater the variance from the predictable outcome of a court case, the higher the level of corruption in the judiciary, an index referred to as “Predictability index” is sighted in World Bank 1997,World Development Report, 1997, Page 8, a measure among other to determine corruption in the judiciary.
The Thirion Commission’s findings and the films produced at that time present evidence of the clandestine manner in which the Oppenheimer Family had manipulated the Namibian government the year after it was established by the SAAG in 1980. The Oppenheimers ensured that the new interim government could not verify the massive quantity of diamonds it was mining and transporting by helicopter to Kimberly in South Africa.
In this way – and contrary to international law – a catalogue of cogent evidence shows the manner in which the Oppenheimers amassed an illegal fortune at Namibia’s expense.
The Diamond Industry Protection Proclamation 17 of 1939 (DIPP), regulated the “Diamond Board” established in terms of the Diamond Board Establishment Proclamation, 1921. Examination of the Diamond Board’s responsibilities as the guardian of the States diamond resource, and how this responsibility was subverted by the Oppenheimers, is given in the Thirion Commission report on page 167-188.
In 1981, immediately after the Government Services Act 1980 (Namibia) was enacted, Oppenheimer (De Beers, Consolidated Diamond Mine – CDM, and Dicorp in Kimberley, concluded an illegal agreement, referred to as the DPA (Diamond Producers Association agreement), with the newly formed SWA Interim Government 1980 and the South African Apartheid Government (SAAG). This DPA agreement secretly manipulated absolute physical control of Namibia’s diamond production, with no independent verification by the State of the actual diamond production mined at Oranjemund which were then exported directly to Kimberley.
In 1982, public accusations made by Eric Lang concerning the ineffective State controls over Oppenheimer, De Beers, Anglo American (ODA)’s Consolidated Diamond Mine CDM) billion dollar Namibian diamond production, and the evidence supplied by the Late Gordon D Brown gave rise to the establishment of Justice Thirion Commission of Inquiry – into alleged irregularities and misapplication of property in representative authorities and the central authority of South West Africa / Namibia, Eighth Interim Report 1985 Control by the State over the prospecting and mining for, and disposing of minerals in South West Africa / Namibia, illegally eliminated the government’s control over its diamond production.
The “capture” of the Diamond Board was described in the Thirion Report 1985 on page 185 “the Diamond Board’s agents who are themselves CDM employees merely take possession of such diamonds as are handed to them by CDM and weighed and dispatched the parcels to Kimberley. Unless the Boards control extends all the way from the production site to the sorting table and from there to the final sale and is exercised by persons independent of the producer, the purported control remains a sham.”
The documentary film “The Case of The Disappearing Diamonds” inspired the making of a comprehensive feature film on the Oppenheimer’s in 1994, titled “The Diamond Empire”, in which the Oppenheimer Family refused to participate.
As the “Key Financial Beneficiary” of the wealth of Namibia, the Oppenheimers’ control over Namibia’s primary resources and financial institutions came about as a result of their pursuit of the premeditated plan to “colonize” Namibia’s economy. They could only succeed in this through a government they had manipulated, i.e. “captured”, on two fronts. This capture commenced in 1971 and was consolidated in 1990. This is the focal point of how to understand the magnitude of the Oppenheimer’s’ wealth and the cause of our country’s increasing national financial despair and social discontent.
The persistent theft of Namibia’s mineral and marine resources is a result of the Oppenheimer’s deeply entrenched network of control over strategic government tasks, particularly in the fields of the judiciary, in state prosecution, and in the police force. It was/is meticulously choreographed to control the Namibian State’s affairs and thus escape justice.
Seven cases during 1992 and 1993, some of them before court, are presented to show the collusion between the Oppenheimers’ and the SAAG’s STRATCOM officials defeating the ends of justice in Namibia, with the Oppenheimers fuelling the war in Angola at US$ 14m/week.
In 1987, the late UN Commissioner to Namibia, Bernt Carlsson, expressed his view on De Beers, Anglo American and their illegal exploitation of Namibia’s diamond and mineral resources. It clearly supported the findings of Justice Thirion’s Report of 1985. The record on which this statement was made is luckily intact.
The head quarters of the loot robbed from central southern Africa.
ANGOLA.
US$14m/per week of illegal diamonds purchased by De Beers that was fueling the war in the country in 1992.
Maurice Tempelsman, New York, Lazara Kaplan.
Please see Application to the United Nations:”
In October 2014, Charles Courtney-Clarke created a public private forum “establishing an economic equilibrium between the key financial beneficiaries to the wealth of the country and the government”. The website recorded that an application was submitted to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and to the International Criminal Court (ICC) to compel the investigation into the unsolved crimes against humanity committed by the South African Apartheid Government during the Namibian independence process supervised by the United Nations Transition Assistance Group (UNTAG), between April 1989 to March 1990, in terms of UN Security Council Resolution 435 (1978)……
…..As a result of the failure of the respective authorities to act and dispense justice in Namibia, South Africa and Her Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom, this website will serve to communicate the on-going demands to International Institutions and governments to dispense Social and Economic Justice.
Excellent work!
The quest for social and economic justice should start right at the beginning with the African bantu Expansion in 1300 AD. The aboriginal khoe-San of Namibia (Basters, Coloureds, naman and San) have been wronged by many nations of the world, conglomerates, gangs, rich families and influential individuals. The trend is unchanged today. All perpetrators must be held accountable: Africans, Europeans, Asians, Middle Eastern countries, Latin Americans and Namibians. The aboriginal khoe-san of Namibia eat soil while thieves and liars live like kings. Where is the justice in that? Swapo must return our ancestral land and property. They must answer for their crimes against the aboriginal peoples of Namibia, Namibians and humanity.
The thieves and thugs of the swapo regime and the minority south African governments must be held accountable to the disease of social of abstraction of the original inhabitants of the country especially the Namas in the south that was robbed by the thugs and crooks of their original natural resources such as the diamonds and many more like in the fish in the sea,they must return it back to the rightful owners now they live like fucking kings and queens on the dispense of the original right holders of this natural resources. I remember one German great man say once that they would steal the natural resources of the Namas but it would not getting stolen out of the South because the Southern part of Namibia is too rich in natural resources and so it will stay for generations to come the old man a German descendant Mr.J.D Moller once said may his soul rest in eternal peace,we want back our ancestral land and natural resources in God’s name because this is seems to be a mickey mouse government that cannot even solve a petty case like the avid scandal,so is the justice system vague and had lot of loopholes
Family needs assistant on the death of their father April 1984 at filling station together with three Americans citizen